ࡱ> KJ(X / 00DTimes New Roman(0(:A 0 DArial Narrowan(0(:A 0 " DArialNarrowan(0(:A 0 0DMonotype Sorts(0(:A 0 @ .  @n?" dd@  @@`` <4XO       0AAPf3f3@8e g4TdTd@:A 0ppp@ <4!d!dl$ 080<4BdBdl$ 080uʚ;2Nʚ;<4ddddlT# 0Xh___PPT2001D<4X@0___PPT10 2___PPT9/ 0? %O ;(5Analysis of Diagnostic Essay: The Deductive Argument English 102 ArgumentationThe Language of Argument:utterance sentence proposition premise conclusion argument<Utterance: a meaningful or non-meaningful verbal expression rLa de da! I don t care what you say. The sky is green. 2 DSentence: a meaningful utterance that has a subject and a predicate We /don t have to agree with our teammates about everything in order to work together effectively.6Proposition: a true or false statement about the world[All students can write outstanding papers in four languages. Human beings are not perfect. :Argument: at least one premise accompanied by a conclusionXHuman beings are not perfect. Horace is a human being. Therefore, Horace is not perfect. IPremise: a proposition that is used as evidence for a claim (conclusion) 6Human beings are not perfect. Horace is a human being. Major Premise: offers a generalization about a large group or class that has been arrived at through inductive reasoning or observation of particulars$Human beings are not perfect. GMinor Premise: makes a statement about a member of that group or class  Horace is a human being. KConclusion (claim): a proposition that is derived from at least one premise!Therefore, Horace is not perfect. ]Valid Argument: The conclusion follows from the premises whether or not the premises are true^]$All students can write outstanding papers in four languages. (T or F?) Horace is a student. (T) Therefore, Horace can write outstanding papers in four languages.(Valid or invalid?) gSound Argument: an argument in which all premises are true and the conclusion follows from the premiseshg$rHuman beings are not perfect. (T) Horace is a human being. (T) Therefore, Horace is not perfect. (valid and sound) jWarrant: a general principle or assumption that establishes a connection between the support and the claimkj$Substantive: based on beliefs about the reliability of factual evidence motivational: based on the values of the arguer and the audience authoritative: based on the credibility of the sources In Support of Mercy KillingMajor Premise (motivational warrant): People have a basic right to choose. Minor Premise (support): Terminally ill and suffering patients are people. Conclusion (claim): Terminally ill and suffering patients have the right to choose mercy killing./Implied Argument (in the introductory anecdote)Major Premise (warrant): When dealing with a terminally ill patient who is suffering terribly, the most humane course of action is desirable. Minor Premise (support): Mercy killing is more humane than prolonging suffering when dealing with a terminally ill patient who is suffering terribly. Conclusion (claim): Mercy killing should be allowed when it is the most humane course of action for a terminally ill and suffering patient.P  ` 3ff` ` ___>?" dF@0?n2d@uK FA@ " d`  n?" dd@   @@``PR   @ ` `PBp>> % bZ( = j2  B?   Ngֳgֳ ?P  T Click to edit Master title style! !.  H8gֳgֳ ?  RClick to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level!     S  T䖟gֳgֳ ?`p  ^*  Tgֳgֳ ?`   `*  T,gֳgֳ ?`@  `*N  6޽h? ? 3ff  Blank  %    ( |  vB  N1?44j2  B?   Ngֳgֳ ?   T Click to edit Master title style! !  H gֳgֳ ?PP   W#Click to edit Master subtitle style$ $  Tt%gֳgֳ ?`p  ^*  T)gֳgֳ ?`   `*  T/gֳgֳ ?`@  `*N  6޽h? ?  3ff 0 `X0 ( K   c $%  P    Z* X   C         c $t(   @   RClick to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level!     S   c $/      \*    s *1  :PX    Z*    s *6  : X   \* N  6޽h? ? ̙3380___PPT10.lPNI  8i( p$" 8 8 c $G  P    > Becky Cooper   8 c $$N      \*  8 s *Q  :PX    g5Analysis of Diagnostic Essay: The Deductive Argument 66  8 s *TU  : X   \* H 8 0޽h ? ̙3380___PPT10.l@ % @(  P    f:gֳgֳ ?      f:gֳgֳ ? ` 0 p   B  s *޽h ? 3ff 8-K0 % P(     f䡜gֳgֳ ?W      fgֳgֳ ?p  B  s *޽h ? 3ff 8-K0 % `(     fgֳgֳ ?      fTgֳgֳ ?   B  s *޽h ? 3ff  p<(  <l < C e   l < C lfP00   H < 0޽h ? 3ff 8-K0 % ( $Qg    flgֳgֳ ?0      fmgֳgֳ ?`   B  s *޽h ? 3ff 8-K0 % (( * ( (  fgֳgֳ ?|`    (  fgֳgֳ ?   B ( s *޽h ? 3ff 8-K0 %  ( lMMM     fٜgֳgֳ ?``      fXڜgֳgֳ ?@@   B  s *޽h ? 3ff 8-K0 % ,( lg , ,  fgֳgֳ ?    ,  f<gֳgֳ ?``@  B , s *޽h ? 3ff 8-K0 % 0( g 0 0  fgֳgֳ ?     0  fxgֳgֳ ?   B 0 s *޽h ? 3ff 8-K0 % $(  AX $ $  fgֳgֳ ?    $  fgֳgֳ ?p``   B $ s *޽h ? 3ff  @(  @l @ C    l @ C P   H @ 0޽h ? 3ff  D( w Dl D C 0`   l D C <   H D 0޽h ? 3ff  H( w Hl H C  @p     l H C   ``    H H 0޽h ? 3ff  L( w Ll L C T P    l L C (    H L 0޽h ? 3ff  0P( w Pl P C @     l P C      H P 0޽h ? 3ffrX' 1Y46};@H>cCFp~-9IK)M OPRmT8 Oh+'0 hp  ( 4 @LT6Analysis of Diagnostic Essay: The Deductive Argument weInformation TechnologyEnfoRebecca R. Cooperlo6beMicrosoft PowerPoint 7.0say@Pʩ@iɗ@МG6g  J  x-- @ !x--'--%]]--'&&--- @ IZ----- @ IZI---- @ IZ [---- @ IZg---- @ IZ u---- @ IZ---- @ IZ ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ ---- @ IZ ---- @ IZ ---- @ IZ )---- @ IZ 3---- @ IZ=---- @ IZO---- @ IZi---k&&&--&&- && &J$#..02 5'8/=6B=HDNKVR^Xf^odyjpuz%5EUfww.& &&-J$#..02 5'8/=6B=HDNKVR^Xf^odyjpuz%5EUfww.-&&&&&-&&&TNPP--- @ IZ----- @ IZI---- @ IZ [---- @ IZg---- @ IZ u---- @ IZ---- @ IZ ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ---- @ IZ ---- @ IZ ---- @ IZ ---- @ IZ )---- @ IZ 3---- @ IZ=---- @ IZO---- @ IZi--- '&&TNPP''@"Arial Narrow-. 3f2 1 Analysis of     ."Systemti-@"Arial Narrow-. 3f"2 ]Diagnostic Essay:     .-@"Arial Narrow-. 3f2 The Deductive    .-@"Arial Narrow-. 3f2 Argument t" .-@Arial-. 2 English 102v   .-@Arial-. 2 Argumentation    .-՜.+,0@    On-screen ShowOLYMPIC COLLEGE-U5{ Times New Roman Arial NarrowArialMonotype SortsBlank6Analysis of Diagnostic Essay: The Deductive Argument The Language of Argument=Utterance: a meaningful or non-meaningful verbal expression ESentence: a meaningful utterance that has a subject and a predicate 7Proposition: a true or false statement about the world;Argument: at least one premise accompanied by a conclusionJPremise: a proposition that is used as evidence for a claim (conclusion) Major Premise: offers a generalization about a large group or class that has been arrived at through inductive reasoning or observation of particularsHMinor Premise: makes a statement about a member of that group or class LConclusion (claim): a proposition that is derived from at least one premise^Valid Argument: The conclusion follows from the premises whether or not the premises are truehSound Argument: an argument in which all premises are true and the conclusion follows from the premiseskWarrant: a general principle or assumption that establishes a connection between the support and the claimIn Support of Mercy Killing0Implied Argument (in the introductory anecdote)  Fonts UsedDesign Template Slide Titles)_ U Rebecca R. CooperRebecca R. Cooper  !"#$%&'()*,-./0123456789;<=>?@ACDEFGHILRoot EntrydO)Current UserBSummaryInformation(+PowerPoint Document(-UDocumentSummaryInformation8: